Coping.org: Tools for Coping with Life's Stressors

Tribute to the Victims of the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks

 

For Now, Rival Warlords Put Aside Bitter Feuds of Past

Background about the Northern Alliance

By John Ward Anderson and Molly Moore
Washington Post Foreign Service
November 12, 2001

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan, Nov. 11 -- The Afghan guerrilla commanders who captured the city of Mazar-e Sharif for the opposition Northern Alliance, and are trying to expand the alliance's control across northern Afghanistan, are three men with disparate ethnic and religious backgrounds and a long history of fighting among themselves.

The three warlords -- Abdurrashid Dostum, Attah Mohammad and Mohammad Mohaqiq -- acknowledged that it was only by setting aside their differences and working together that they were able to end the Taliban's three-year occupation of Mazar-e Sharif.

"Revenge is ingrained in their minds," said Syed Fida Yunas, a Pakistani from the Pashtun ethnic group that dominates the Taliban. Yunas, who served as a diplomat in Afghanistan for two decades and has written histories of the country, argued that it was unlikely the diverse cast of characters could overcome mutual animosities to run Mazar-e Sharif -- much less the country. "I'm sorry to say, nobody likes each other," he said.

The three commanders are among the warlords who tried to jointly rule Afghanistan for a period in the 1990s, but instead plunged the country into a deadly civil war fueled by ethnic hatred, personal feuds and betrayals, revenge killings and ruthless bombings of civilians, especially in Kabul, the capital.

Their relations over the past two decades have been marked by opportunism and treachery, although many analysts say that as long as they share a common enemy -- such as the Taliban -- chances are they will stay united, particularly as they try to consolidate their hold over the north. Today, for example, Dostum, Mohammad and Mohaqiq held an extraordinary summit and agreed to replace military rule in Mazar-e Sharif with a civilian administration.

Human rights activists warn that the United States is gradually becoming ensnared in the politically dicey mission of backing warlords with abysmal human rights records who may not have widespread support within Afghanistan, and who could face prosecution by international tribunals for crimes against humanity and other war-related offenses. Many of the warlords may eventually be opposed by fiercely independent Afghans for aligning themselves with a foreign power, the United States.

"The U.S. and its allies should not cooperate with commanders whose record of brutality raises questions about their legitimacy inside Afghanistan," the international organization Human Rights Watch said in a recent statement. It criticized "the deplorable record of attacks on civilians" by "the various parties that comprise the United Front," the more formal name of the Northern Alliance.

Afghan warlords and their militias typically are identified with different ethnic and tribal groups in different regions of Afghanistan. They frequently have conflicting religious leanings and often are backed by competing neighboring countries.

The militias were formed by groups of Islamic mujaheddin, "holy warriors" who jointly fought against the Soviet Union's 1979-89 occupation of Afghanistan. But when the communist successor regime collapsed in 1992, the militias turned their guns on one another in a deadly power struggle to control the country and the capital. Their ruthless fighting virtually destroyed Kabul -- 24,000 people were killed in the city in 1994 alone -- and was instrumental in fueling the rise of the Taliban, which won popular support in the mid-1990s by promising to end the country's civil war and to restore law and order.

Dostum, 46, a burly former communist, high school dropout and reputedly hard-drinking atheist, is an ethnic Uzbek who has been a key ally and enemy of virtually every militia in Afghanistan. He returned from exile in Turkey in April to rejoin the Northern Alliance.

Once Afghanistan's best-armed warlord and one of the few with fighter jets, he frequently changed sides in the middle of a fight and tilted the country's entire military equation. He has been backed by Uzbekistan, Russia and, most recently, Turkey, but over the years he has lost much of his military equipment and many of his forces.

In 1997, his top deputy, Gen. Abdul Malik Pahlawan, defected to the Taliban, forcing Dostum to flee Afghanistan. After the Taliban entered Mazar-e Sharif, Dostum's traditional stronghold, Pahlawan turned against his new allies and allegedly killed about 3,000 Taliban soldiers. When the Taliban retook the city the following year, they allegedly executed about 2,000 people, mostly ethnic Hazara Shiite Muslims.

Dostum -- who used to control the region from a large mud fort near the town of Shebergan -- was a bitter rival of both Mohaqiq and Mohammad, who joined him last week in capturing Mazar-e Sharif. And those two warlords also reportedly harbor deep animosities.

Mohaqiq, an ethnic Tajik, was a top leader of the Shiite Muslim fighting force Hizb-i-Wahdat-i-Islami, when that group joined with Pahlawan in ousting Dostum from Mazar-e Sharif in 1997. His fighters allegedly participated in the subsequent atrocities against Taliban forces, which included dumping soldiers into wells alive and then throwing in grenades.

Mohammad is a Sunni Muslim from the Hazara ethnic group. He is affiliated with the strongest military and political force in the Northern Alliance, Jamiat-i-Islami, the Tajik-dominated militia loyal to Burhanuddin Rabbani. Rabbani himself is a divisive figure, having refused to relinquish the Afghan presidency in 1996 as required under a power-sharing agreement with his coalition partners.

In the war against the Soviets in the 1980s, Mohammad fought against Dostum, who sided with the Soviets. In the recent campaign to take Mazar-e Sharif, Mohammad's forces reportedly moved to within a few miles of the city, but were forced to quickly withdraw after being left exposed when Dostum failed to back up his advance. Dostum and Mohammad then reconciled and agreed to work together under Gen. Mohammed Fahim, the Northern Alliance's defense chief.

Military analysts say that the next logical step for the alliance forces would be to consolidate their positions around Mazar-e Sharif and secure an overland supply route to Uzbekistan, where the United States has supply bases.

Dostum, Mohammad and representatives of the Hizb-i-Wahdat-i-Islami political party met today and agreed to station the bulk of their forces in separate camps outside and to the south of the Mazar-e Sharif. Each of the three forces will send 100 men to share a garrison inside Mazar-e Sharif, which will be administered by civil authorities under Rabbani.

The alliance is also expected to begin advancing west toward the city and province of Herat, where another legendary warlord, Ismail Khan, is hoping to recapture the province where he was once governor.

Khan, a 54-year-old Tajik, defended his base against Soviet forces for 10 years, then joined Rabbani's Jamiat-i-Islami when the Soviets withdrew. He governed his fairly peaceful and prosperous province until 1995, when he was accused of accepting payoffs to allow Herat to fall to the Taliban.

Khan escaped to neighboring Iran. He returned in late 1996 in an attempt to reclaim Herat, but one of his commanders defected to the Taliban and surrendered Khan to them. He spent more than a year in jail in the southern city of Kandahar before escaping with the help of sympathetic local soldiers. He fled again to Iran and was drawn back to Afghanistan only within the last year.

Following the traditional Afghan belief that whoever rules Kabul rules the country, the Northern Alliance leaders are anxiously planning their return to Kabul. Their ultimate test will be expelling the Taliban from the city and declaring a truce among themselves while an interim government is established. That challenge proved too much for them after the Soviets withdrew from Afghanistan in 1989.

Mindful of the intense factional differences, both President Bush and Secretary of State Colin L. Powell said last week they hoped the Northern Alliance, which is made up predominantly of ethnic Uzbeks and Tajiks, would not try to take Kabul. Powell said the capital should be a neutral "open city," devoid of armed groups, until an interim government is established.

A key challenge will be finding a charismatic Pashtun leader willing to join the Northern Alliance who can rally his ethnic group behind him. Pashtuns make up about 40 percent of Afghanistan, Tajiks about 25 percent, Hazaras 19 percent and Uzbeks about 8 percent.

One top Pashtun, Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, a brutal warlord who received huge amounts of aid from the United States and Pakistan during the war against the Soviets, and who ruthlessly attacked Kabul and enforced a strict food blockade during the ensuing siege of the capital in the early 1990s, has been negotiating an alliance with the Taliban in recent weeks.

Hekmatyar, who now lives in Iran, reportedly has advised the Taliban where they can find hidden weapons caches in Afghanistan, including shoulder-launched, surface-to-air Stinger missiles.

Another Pashtun warlord who controlled parts of Kabul and relentlessly attacked the capital in the 1990s, Abdul Rasul Sayyaf, is a top commander with the Northern Alliance, but it is questionable how much support he has. Sayyaf, a member of the conservative Wahhabi sect of Sunni Islam, was strongly backed by Saudi Arabia during the Soviet occupation and reportedly is a bitter enemy of some of his nominal allies in the Northern Alliance, particularly Dostum.

"It will be nothing short of a miracle if an ultra Wahhabi [Sayyaf], an orthodox Shiite [Mohaqiq] and an atheist warlord [Dostum] form a stable government in Muslim Afghanistan," said a senior military intelligence official from Pakistan who is monitoring events in Afghanistan. "Those who expect Rasul Sayyaf to join hands with . . . Mohaqiq or Gen. Dostum don't know the ground realities in that country."

Correspondent Doug Struck in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, and special correspondent Kamran Khan in Karachi, Pakistan, contributed to this report.

© 2001 The Washington Post Company

 

 

BACK TO VOICES OF REASON PAGE

BACK to Coping with the 9.11.01 Aftermath

HOME

 

 

 

 


Coping.org is a Public Service of James J. Messina, Ph.D. & Constance M. Messina, Ph.D.,  Email: jjmess@tampabay.rr.com  ©1999-2007 James J. Messina, Ph.D. & Constance Messina, Ph.D.  Note: Original materials on this site may be reproduced for your personal, educational, or noncommercial use as long as you credit the authors and website.