It was just before Jodie Hemerda set off a family feud by announcing her
opposition to the United States bombing in Afghanistan that she began scouring
the Internet for others who shared her views.
She was not having much success in her hometown, Parker, Colorado, where only
the rare minivan does not fly an American flag. Rather than risk alienating the
other mothers in the neighborhood, Ms. Hemerda, 30, has refrained from voicing
her antiwar sentiments as they shuttle the children to and from school.
Even her husband, who threatened to boycott Thanksgiving dinner with his
parents if they could not respect Ms. Hemerda's right to her opinions, stops
short of endorsing her viewpoint.
Like many of the small and scattered group of Americans who disapprove of the
Bush administration's response to the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, Ms. Hemerda
is finding the Internet to be a powerful tool for reaching other dissenters.
After joining thousands of others in signing an antiwar petition on the Web site
www.9-11peace.org , she was emboldened to
speak out at a local gathering about the death of Afghan civilians.
"Knowing that there were other people out there with my opinions made it a
lot easier," Ms. Hemerda said. "It's just really nice to know that you're not
alone."
With opinion polls showing overwhelming support for President Bush, war
protesters are relying heavily on the Internet to weave their fragmented
constituents into a movement. Though they number far fewer than the opponents of
the war in Vietnam or even the Persian Gulf war, the first generation of
Internet activists may well be spreading their message farther and faster than
their predecessors in political protest.
Protesters making use of the Internet range from former hippies in rural
Vermont who download ready- made leaflets to hand out at their weekly
demonstrations to David H. Pickering, 22, of Brooklyn, who started an online
peace petition that was presented to Prime Minister Tony Blair by members of the
British Parliament last month with 500,000 signatures from around the world.
And then there are those like Cleo Meek, of Los Angeles, who simply typed
"protest" into the Internet search engine Yahoo (news/quote)
a few days after the bombing began in Afghanistan and discovered the
International Action Center, which has organized several protests since the
airstrikes began. Ms. Meek has since joined the center's volunteer staff.
"The character of political action organizing has completely shifted since
the gulf war," said Brian Becker, co-director of the International Action
Center, which was founded in 1992 by Ramsey Clark, a former United States
attorney general. "Instead of a physical location like our office, the Web site
has become our mobilization headquarters."
The relative anonymity of the technology also allows Internet users to absorb
and express alternative views without fear of reprisal or to do so anonymously
at a time when some protesters say the nation's patriotic fervor makes it more
difficult to voice dissent.
People opposed to the war are "certainly one of the most vocal groups on the
Net," said Andrew Carvin, who runs an online discussion forum about Sept. 11 and
its aftermath. Mr. Carvin said many participants use free, disposable e- mail
addresses and do not identify themselves.
America's first war of the Internet age is spawning a new cohort of
protesters who take for granted the ability to consult a vast array of
international news sources with a few mouse-clicks and is teaching old activists
new tactics.
Jack Smith, a veteran of the movement against the Vietnam War started using
e-mail only a year ago. But when he saw the names of student antiwar protesters
at Vassar College in a local newspaper article, he looked up their e-mail
addresses on the college Web site and persuaded them to join in the activities
of a community group in New Paltz, N.Y., committed to social justice causes.
"Everyone has their own e-mail list," said Mr. Smith, 67, of New Paltz,
adding that those networks are one reason that "at this stage an antiwar
movement, and quite a vital one, has formed faster than any I can remember."
When students at Occidental College in Los Angeles decided to begin a 56-hour
fast on Nov. 9 as a show of solidarity with Afghan civilians injured in the
bombardments, they sent e-mail messages to their friends at other colleges, who
forwarded them to their friends, and so on. One message found its way to an
e-mail list called ActionLA and caught the attention of activists on several
other Los Angeles-area campuses. Soon students at Princeton, Boston College and
Oxford University in England had signed on.
"I don't understand how Vietnam got organized in the way it did," said Robert
James Wallace, 18, a freshman at Occidental who helped organize the hunger
strike. "Without the Internet there's no way we would have gotten 17 colleges on
board in two weeks."
Of course, those 1960's peaceniks somehow did manage to make themselves heard
without the Internet, and some latter-day advocates argue that the tool can be
overused.
"We need to talk to people face-to- face about why we think the war is bad,"
said Kirstin Roberts, 30, a student at Harold Washington College in Chicago. "I
spend way too much time in front of my computer."
Still, Ms. Roberts said the Internet was vital to pulling together three
regional student antiwar conferences in recent weeks. Alyssa Erickson, 21, a
senior at Luther College in Decorah, Iowa, saw an announcement for the Nov. 10
Chicago conference on the www.Protest.net
Web site.
After returning from Chicago, Ms. Erickson, who had previously been hesitant
to express her views, organized a teach-in to discuss nonviolent options for
bringing to justice the terrorists responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks.
To those who pointed out that the Taliban has almost been defeated, she
replied by handing out information from the Revolutionary Association of the
Women of Afghanistan criticizing the Northern Alliance.
"When people say `Why are you opposed to the war, the Northern Alliance is
winning,' I say `Look at what the women of Afghanistan are saying about the
Northern Alliance,' " Ms. Erickson said. "More people are refugees and more
people are starving and they still don't have a government of their choosing."
She said she had downloaded the information from
www.rawa.org .