Coping with
the 9.11.01 Aftermath

9.11 Coping Strategies
Coping in the Business Place
After September 11: Employment Law Issues
By Julie Crane, Rita Risser and Ann Kiernan Attorneys at law
We at Fair Measures grieve with those who have lost family,
friends and coworkers, and join in the praise for the countless acts of
heroism. We are also aware that these events have brought up many questions for
employers and employees. We offer answers to some of these questions below.
-
What Are the Rights of Reservists Called for Duty?
-
How Should Layoffs be Implemented?
-
Are There Special Rules for Laying Off H-1B Visa Workers?
-
What are the Rights of Muslim and Arab Employees?
-
Do Employees Have the Right to Express Unpopular
Political Views?
What Are the Rights of Reservists Called for Duty?
The Pentagon has said it expects to call up as many as
47,500 members of the Reserves and National Guard to active duty. Managers
should review company policies and be aware of their responsibilities towards
these employees.
The Uniformed Services Employment and Re-Employment Rights
Act (USERRA) protects reservists from discrimination of any kind that relates,
even in part, to the employee's military service. If called to duty, reservists
must provide their employers advance notice of their orders, either orally or in
writing, unless precluded by military necessity. While employers can ask
commanders to temporarily defer employees for later duty on a case-by-case
basis, the final decision rests with military authorities.
Employers must promptly reinstate reservists once their
tour of duty is complete. Time limits for reservists to return to work depend
on the duration of the orders and range from 8 hours to 90 days after completion
of military duty.
The National Committee for Employer Support of the Guard
and Reserve (ESGR) was created to serve as a liaison between reserve members and
their civilian employers. Employers can find answers to their specific
questions by contacting the ESGR Ombudsmen Services at (800) 336-4590, or at
www.esgr.org
How Should Layoffs be Implemented?
Amidst all the turmoil, it is important to remember that
layoffs should be done in a principled way, not only to avoid lawsuits, but also
because it is important at this time to treat everyone with deep respect.
For more information about layoffs, including a legal
reference guide, a step-by-step checklist, FAQs, and forms required under the
WARN Act, COBRA, for H-1B visa workers, go to our web site at
http://fairmeasures.com/pcm_fmls.html
At a minimum, when conducting a layoff, an employer should:
-
Follow all company policies,
-
Have a legitimate business reason for picking individuals
for layoff (such as seniority, performance, skill set, flexibility, or other
economic justification),
-
Document your decision-making process with objective,
verifiable facts,
-
Analyze your initial lay off list to see if your
decisions are having an uneven impact on the basis of age, race, gender, etc.
If so, contact your Human Resources or Legal advisor,
-
Have the final paycheck ready, including accrued
vacation, bonuses, overtime, or commissions due,
-
Give notice of continuation of health benefits under
COBRA, and
-
Give written notice under the WARN Act.
The WARN Act does not require 60 days notice in cases of
layoffs due to "unforeseeable business circumstances," but it does require that
written notices be given to employees, any Union affected, the State
unemployment office and local governmental officials.
Note for employees: if you think you have been unfairly
laid off, find out your rights with our Wrongful Termination Guide at
http://www.fairmeasures.com/pcm_wtcl.html.
Are There Special Rules for Laying Off H-1B Visa
Workers?
The American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century
Act of 2000 prohibits companies from laying off U.S. workers within 90 days of
hiring an H-1B visa worker in the same job classification. After that, the law
is silent on what an employer should do in the case of a general layoff.
Employers should not use visa status as a reason to pick
someone for layoff. However, the H-1B regulations make clear that these
employees are temporary workers. An employer usually should lay off temporary
workers before laying off regular employees.
The employer also can use other objective criteria and
apply it to H-1B and U.S. workers alike.
If H-1B visa workers are laid off, employers have three
important duties:
(1) offer to pay the air fare of the workers back to their
home countries, and
(2) give immediate notice to the U.S. Immigration and
Naturalization Service of the termination of employment, and
(3) don't discriminate in severance or other termination
benefits.
The legal requirement to offer to pay air fare to the home
country is very specific, and applies whether the company originally recruited
the employees from abroad, or hired them within the U.S.
The requirement is also very narrow. A company is only
required to pay one-way air fares for the workers, not their dependents, nor any
additional shipping costs.
Since many non-immigrants in this situation elect not to
return to their home countries, companies can inform them of their right to
obtain transportation through the company's travel agency, within 30 days of
termination. The employer is then relieved of the obligation, and in most cases
will not be out the money.
What are the Rights of Muslim and Arab Employees?
There have been many reports that Muslims, persons of Arab
descent and those who "look" Middle Eastern are being harassed and intimidated.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which enforces federal
anti-discrimination law, is paying special attention to these claims. Cari M.
Dominguez, Chair of the EEOC, called on all employers and employees across the
country to promote tolerance and guard against unlawful workplace
discrimination.
A manager has a unique role in preventing harassment and
discrimination in the workplace. Whether it be a discriminatory comment,
shunning, or worse, a manager should stop the behavior. In addition, managers
can do the following:
-
Remind employees of policies against harassment based on
religion, ethnicity, and national origin,
-
Communicate procedures for addressing workplace
discrimination and harassment,
-
Urge employees to report any improper conduct,
-
Provide training and counseling, as appropriate, and
-
Be a model of good will towards all employees.
For more information, the EEOC has developed an information
sheet, which is available by contacting EEOC's Publications Distribution Center
at (800) 669-3362 voice and (800) 800-3302 TTY and on the EEOC's Web site at
www.eeoc.gov .
For further in-depth information on harassment and
discrimination law, see our Web site at
http://www.fairmeasures.com/discrimination.html .
Do Employees Have the Right to Express Unpopular
Political Views?
As this crisis continues, people are going to express their
opinions about what happened and what is the appropriate response. Employees in
the private sector do not have the right to discuss non-work related issues at
work. Most employers allow it, but it's important to realize that it is a
privilege that the employer can revoke at any time. After all, the purpose of
the workers is to work.
If management allows discussion in the workplace, employees
must be respectful and tolerant of different opinions. If these discussions
disrupt the office, undermine a manager's authority, or impair working
relationships, the employer should stop the discussion.
In most states, employees are protected against
discrimination, harassment or termination as a result of expressing their
political views. They are protected by general privacy laws, specific political
speech statutes, or the laws prohibiting discrimination against employees who
engage in lawful activity.
Public sector employees have more freedom of speech than
employees in private industry. For example, when Ronald Reagan was shot, an
employee of a Texas sheriff's department said, "If they go for him again, I hope
they get him." She was fired, but the U.S. Supreme Court held that was
unconstitutional because she was speaking on a matter of public concern. Rankin
v. McPherson, 107 S.Ct. 2891 (1987).
Do not take any adverse employment action against employees
because of their political opinions. If employees have been told to get back to
work, and instead continue the discussion, they can be reprimanded, disciplined
or ultimately terminated for insubordination.
In Closing
At this time in our nation's history, it is most important
to remember the principles upon which our country is founded. The U.S. stands
for the rule of law, justice, fairness, tolerance, and respect. As managers, we
have the ability to bring those values to life in our daily world of work.
Copyright 2001 by Fair Measures Corp.

Please
Sign Our Guest Book
BACK TO
Coping in the Business Place
BACK
to Coping with the 9.11.01 Aftermath
HOME
|